Home > News > Industry News

What is the best thermal interface material?

2025-04-30

The best thermal interface material (TIM) depends on your specific application, such as power level, mechanical constraints, cost, and ease of application. However, here's a breakdown of top options based on performance and use case:


🔝 Top Thermal Interface Materials by Category


1. High-End Performance: Liquid Metal

- Example: Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut

- Thermal Conductivity: ~73 W/m·K

- Pros: Extremely high thermal conductivity

- Cons: Electrically conductive, can damage aluminum, difficult to apply

2. Premium Thermal Paste:

- Example: Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut, Arctic MX-6

- Thermal Conductivity: ~8–12.5 W/m·K

- Pros: Non-conductive, easy to apply, great for CPUs/GPUs

- Cons: Degrades over time, not reusable


3. Phase-Change Materials (PCM):

- Used in: Laptops, servers

- Pros: Automatically conforms to surfaces, good for mass production

- Cons: Limited reusability, modest thermal conductivity (~3–7 W/m·K)


4. Thermal Pads:

- Example: Fujipoly Ultra Extreme, Arctic Thermal Pad

- Thermal Conductivity: ~6–17 W/m·K

- Pros: Easy to install, reusable, clean

- Cons: Slightly lower performance than paste, pressure-dependent


5. Graphite Sheets:

- Example: Panasonic Pyrolytic Graphite

- Thermal Conductivity: Up to 1500 W/m·K in-plane

- Pros: High performance in specific orientations, reusable

- Cons: Directional conductivity, expensive


6. Silicone-Based Pads/Gels:

- Used in: Power electronics, automotive

- Pros: Electrically insulating, durable

- Cons: Moderate thermal conductivity



🏆 Best Overall (for Most Users):

- Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut — for enthusiast PC cooling (non-conductive, high performance)

- Fujipoly Extreme Pads — for applications needing reusable, pressure-compliant pads



Previous:No News
Next:No News

Leave Your Message

  • Click Refresh verification code